Publications, press articles, rankings, awards
Mind the Gap between the UPC and the High Court of Justice
Different approaches and conclusions in the case of Advanced Cell Diagnostics vs. Molecular Instruments
Replacement of formal service by publication on webpage of the UPC
Orders of Local Divisions of Milan and Mannheim
The Paris Local Division of the UPC confirms Jurisdiction in the Sun Patent Trust v. Vivo Case
On October 30, 2025, the Paris Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued an order (UPC_CFI_361/2025) rejecting the plea of lack of jurisdiction raised by Vivo in the dispute against Sun Patent Trust.
UPC Decision: The Paris Central Division clarifies its method for assessing inventive step
In a key decision dated 20 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_189/2024), in the case between Meril Life Sciences and Edwards Lifesciences, the Paris Central Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has provided important clarifications on its approach to assessing inventive step.
UPC – Admission of Apple as an intervener in a dispute concerning the confidentiality regime
On 23 September 2025, the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued an important order (UPC_CoA_631/2025 and 632/2025) regarding the admission of Apple as an intervener in appeals filed by Ericsson in infringement actions pending before the local division of Milan against ASUS, Arvato et Digital River.
UPC Court fee amendment as of January 1, 2026
The Administrative Committee of the Unified Patent Court has adopted amendments to the court fees.
UPC – Infringement by equivalence is becoming clearer, but a ruling from the Court of Appeal is still awaited
As provided for in Article 69(1) EPC, “the extent of the protection conferred by a European patent […] shall be determined by the claims.”
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court defines the standards to assess “added matter”
In decision UPC_CoA_774/2024, dated October 2, 2025, the Court of Appeal of the UPC held that the same standard applies to assess “added matter” in granted claims of a patent whether in view of the application as filed, or in view of each parent application from which the patent derives, when the patent is issued from a divisional application.
Unified Patent Court: the recognition of the French “saisie-contrefaçon” mechanism at the European level
The “saisie-contrefaçon” is a long-standing evidentiary measure familiar to French intellectual property practitioners. It has been successfully incorporated into the framework governing the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”), which has been in force for two years. The main points to remember are presented below.
Lavoix: Your trusted partner for litigation before the Unified Patent Court
Since the establishment of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) one year ago, Lavoix, a European group specialized in intellectual property, has asserted itself as a leader in managing patent litigation.
Romania will accede the UPC agreement on September 1st 2024
Romania has deposited its instrument of ratification on May 31, 2024 and will accede to the UPC agreement on September 1st, 2024.
Cumulative Protection under the UPC Framework
Cumulative Protection: European Patent and National Patent vs Unitary Patent and National Patent
UPC and opt-out: definition, advantages and drawbacks
The present system of European (EP) patents granted by the European Patent Office, has the drawback that the same patent, validated in several states, may lead to several parallel disputes in these jurisdictions. The Unified Patent package creates a unitary effect for European patents encompassing the states that have ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA – to be found here). That is to say, an EP patent with unitary effect will have the same effects in all the states that ratified the UPCA and where said patent has been validated. It also creates a single court (the Unified Patent
(more)