Publications, press articles, rankings, awards
European Patent Office rated top for patent and service quality
The Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) once again initiated a benchmarking survey and let users vote among the world’s five largest patent offices for the quality of its patents and services. Again, the EPO has topped the survey this year in both categories like it has ever since this annual survey was started by IAM in 2010.
The survey’s results showed that 26 % of the participants rate patents of the EPO as “excellent”. This is in increase from 23% last year and places the EPO well ahead of the other IP5 offices. The respondents also agreed that the EPO is maintaining its high level of quality. Overall, more than 87% of respondents describe the service of the EPO as “good”, “very good” or “excellent”, also putting the EPO well ahead of the other IP5 offices.
Moreover, the EPO is the only office of the IP5 offices for which patent quality ranks as the top motivation for filing among the respondents. In the other jurisdictions, the commercial importance of the local market is the key factor to file patent application.
This year’s survey was conducted in September and October 2021 among several hundred IP professionals. Participants were asked
about the EPO, Japan Patent Office (JPO), Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).
Austrian parliament choses to ratify the pap-protocol
Yesterday, December 2nd, 2021, the Austrian Bundesrat (second chamber of the Austrian Parliament) approved unanimously the Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court on provisional application (the PAP-Protocol) of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA).
The current state of play towards the set up of the Unified Patent Court
The Unified Patent Court Agreement will enter into a provisional preparatory stage once 13 signatory states of the Agreement including Germany, France and the United Kingdom and having ratified said Agreement have ratified or expressed their consent to be bound by the Protocol on Provisional Application (A.3(1) of the Protocol).
The German Federal Government officially ratified the UPC Act of Approval on August 13th.
The publication of the law in the Federal Law Gazette finally puts an end to the legal complications that have been blocking the german ratification process and, consequently, the establishment of the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
But this does not mean that the UPC can finally start to operate.
German Federal Constitutionnal Court’s decision
By order of June 23, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) rejected two applications for preliminary injunction against the Act of Approval that was adopted on December 18, 2020, for the purposes of ratifying the Agreement of 19 February 2013 on a Unified Patent Court (UPC Act of Approval).
This decision was highly expected because the process of ratification of the UPC Act of Approval and thus, the establishment of the UPC has been delayed until the ruling of the Court.
Again, and again: the UPC agreement is further challenged in Germany
Although the German Parliament (« Bundesrat ») recently voted in favor of the ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) (that we reported here), and despite the political will (see there), the German ratification of the UPCA is again put on hold.
The German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) advised that that two new constitutional complaints were filed on the very same day on which the Bundesrat approved the ratification (18th December 2020).
One of the complaint, filed by Düsseldorf lawyer Ingve Stjerna, who already filed an earlier constitutional complaint in 2017, aims at obtaining an interim order to cease the ratification process until a decision on the merits.