Publications, press articles, rankings, awards
UDRP complaint: counterfeiting is not equivalent to cybersquatting
The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) procedure is an arbitration procedure initiated with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center allowing trademark owners to oppose the abusive registration of a domain name.
The house mark, a limited reach
The house mark is a concept from the field of marketing that has been appropriated by trademark law.
What is the benefit of registering a patronymic brand for an athlete?
Many athletes benefit from brand protection that allows them to effectively combat opportunism and significantly increase their visibility.
Wine labelling: creativity from constraint(s)
…or how to make the most of the latest mandatory statements to clarify the image of your wine and ensure its protection.
Trademark protection for the Lego® toy figures: child’s play?
On 6 December 2023, the General Court of the European Union dismissed two invalidity actions brought by BB Services GmbH against two three-dimensional trademarks relating to toy figures, on the grounds that their shapes are not exclusively dictated by the nature of the product itself or by a shape necessary to obtain a technical result (General Court of the European Union judgements T-297/22 and T-298/22).
Tolerating is risky!
Often commented on, the FREE v. FREE SBE decision (Paris Court of Appeal – Pôle 05 ch. 02, January 14, 2022 / n° 20/05019, S. A.S. FREE/S. A.S. FREE SBE) raises the question of the starting point of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence.
Transfer of IP rights for free: the downside of gratuity
The transfer of intellectual property rights free of charge must be qualified as a donation, and as such must comply with the requirements specific to the matter (Decision of the Paris Court of Justice, February 8, 2022, No. 19/14142). This case involved a trademark and Community designs owned by two individuals, Mr. X and Mr. Z. The rights were transferred in 2015 to company A, of which Mr. Z is the sole partner and manager. In 2018, Mr. X criticized the transfer that took place in 2015 and sued Mr. Z and the company A for nullity of the
(more)